 |
| |
| Analysis: IT
Industry -- The Challenge of Staying Competitive |
| |
By Brian Asmus
August 30, 04
( The following story of 4.400 words may seem a bit long, but
it contains comprehensive information about the present status
of Taiwan's ICT industry, surely of interest for buyers who like
broad-based information to back up their purchasing decisions.
We reprint it courtesy of the American Chamber of Commerce in
Taipei from TOPICS, the chamber's monthly membership magazine.
Ed. )
Taiwanese companies continue to have a lock-hold on many important
sectors of the international information-technology industry.
The island is currently the world's fourth-largest IT hardware
producer and the number-one supplier in 10 product categories,
as well as a major sourcing center for global IT companies.
It has managed to retain its leading position by moving much
of the manufacturing to China, where it dominates IT production.
Rounding out its leadership position, the island is also strong
in the upstream sector of the industry; it is the world's fourth
largest semiconductor producer and second largest producer of
large-sized liquid-crystal displays (LCDs).
But as large global IT entities have followed Dell's lead to
pursue aggressive pricing strategies in recent years, Taiwanese
companies have found their profit margins tightly squeezed.
Profits for the contract-manufacturing business, known as original-equipment
(OEM) and original-design (ODM) manufacturing, are now often
as low as 2% to 5%. When looking at the huge US$10-billion annual
turnover of a company such as Hon Hai Precision (also known
as Foxconn), for example, it is important to remember that the
profit margin may be only 5%, notes one analyst. OEM and ODM
work is all about mass production and cost reduction.
A joke making the rounds in the IT field demonstrates how competitive
the market has become. When a Taiwanese company develops a new
product, the story goes, it enjoys profit margins of 50%. When
a second company enters the fray, they both get 25% margins,
but when a third gets into the picture, the profit for all three
becomes zero.
Companies such as Philips and Dell buy from Taiwan in big volume
because it is the cheapest place to source from. They factor
in profit margins of 2% or even less for their suppliers, putting
the Taiwanese companies in a take-it-or-leave-it situation.
Turning down the order can mean getting stuck with no way to
cover fixed costs.
That price pressure has encouraged some leading companies to
attempt to develop their own brands. While many challenges face
any company that hopes to achieve global name recognition, several
-- including BenQ, Foxconn, and Acer -- seem to be achieving
some success, in sharp contrast to the failures of similar efforts
15 years ago. At the same time, other IT companies are sticking
solely to their OEM and ODM relationships with important global
players, preferring to stay with the businesses they know, even
if they are less profitable.
Source of Taiwan's strengths
The Taiwan External Trade Development Council (TAITRA) divides
information and communications technology into six categories:
IT hardware, information appliances, software and services,
communications, LCD panels, and semiconductors. In 2003, Taiwan's
production value was US$57.1 billion for IT hardware, US$5.7
billion for LCD panels, and US $4.8 billion for information
appliances, a new category that includes such items as PDAs,
smart phones, set-top boxes, and home media centers. The Taipei
Computer Association (TCA) predicts that the production value
for IT hardware will rise to US$70 billion this year, with continued
annual growth of 15-20% over the next several years.
Counting its offshore production, the island's powerful IT
sector currently accounts for 67% of the world's notebook PCs,
65% of LCD monitors, 79% of motherboards, 55% of color display
tube monitors (CDTs), 91% of scanners, 42% of optical disk drives
(ODD), and 79% of cable modems. In the important related industry
of LCD panels, the island's manufacturers last year accounted
for 39% of global production and expect to become the world's
number-one source of supply this year, passing South Korea.
That would add greatly to Taiwan's competitive strength, as
these panels are important components in many IT products.
Taiwan enjoys its enviable position in the IT industry, says
Philip Huang, manager of TAITRA's capital goods section, because
of its "unbeatable global logistics and flexible delivery,"
its well-established high-tech industrial "clusters"
that maintain close links with Silicon Valley, and the extensive
expertise Taiwanese companies have accumulated in OEM, ODM,
and OBM (original brand manufacturing). The major international
procurement offices (IPOs) have increasingly recognized the
value in sourcing from Taiwan. In 1999, IPOs purchased US$21
billion in goods from Taiwan. By 2003, that number had more
than doubled to US$45 billion.
Huang also points to Taiwan's rich stash of foreign-exchange
reserves -- the third highest in the world -- and to the fact
that foreigners are allowed to operate securities, futures,
securities financing, and trust investments in Taiwan. These
factors mean that Taiwan has abundant access to the capital
needed for research and investment.
Technology-intensive industries account for more than 50% of
Taiwan's manufacturing output and the ratio of R&D expenditure
to GDP has risen steadily from 0.6% in 1986 to 3% in 2002. Taiwan's
leading manufacturing industries are characterized by strong
vertical integration, with a complete range of upstream factories
supplying mid- and downstream assembly lines. This has enabled
the island to grab and retain such high world-market shares.
Research rewards
Investment into research has also paid off handsomely. In 2001,
Taiwan patented 6,545 products in the United States, of which
3,003 were high-tech patents. By country, the number of patents
awarded was the fourth highest, behind only the United States,
Japan, and Germany. One factor aiding that development is the
fact that more than 20,000 people in Taiwan receive either a
Master's degree or Ph.D. every year, providing a wealth of managerial
and R&D talent for multinational corporations.
With more and more products being developed to foster a digital
home or digital lifestyle, the next step for the market is clearly
one of convergence between IT and consumer electronics. "The
trend in the next three years will be the digital home,"
says Rosemary Ho, country managing director of HP Taiwan. "It's
not just being propelled by consumer interest. There is motivation
from the entire supply chain to target three areas -- mobility,
digitalization, and virtualization." Inhabitants of such
digital homes will be able to go beyond basic computing to perform
such functions as sharing digital photos and editing home videos.
HP currently is increasing its focus on product offerings by
developing and commercializing 24 new product lines. An important
part of adding variables to existing product lines is localization,
says Ho. "We have a lot of product differentiation going
on at our product development center in Taiwan."
"The most important trend in the computer industry is
the shift from computers alone to digital content, communications,
and digital consumer electronics," says Li Chang, deputy
secretary general of TCA's Overseas Service Division. He attributes
this development to the fact that the PC market is already quite
mature, leading many companies to move into digital electronics.
While large-screen TVs started to appear on the market 10 years
ago, for example, the market was limited until the digital-home
trend began to spark heavy demand.
Given that much of the technology on the market is similar,
companies are trying to gain advantage by maximizing economies
of scale. That is why so many computer companies that originally
made only computers, mobile phones, or flat-panel TVs are now
moving to produce all three, since all of them are key products
in the digital world.
Taiwanese companies seem well placed to put these market forces
to their advantage. "Taiwan can play a key role in supplying
the hardware," says Li. "It's only real competitor
is Samsung in South Korea." Two areas giving Taiwanese
companies an edge are their prowess in commercialization and
design. In Taiwan, it takes only three months to develop a prototype
and move into mass production, says Li. In addition, there are
more than 300 IT-product design houses on the island -- second
only to the number in the United States. Many of these were
founded by returnees from Silicon Valley who still maintain
valuable connections with the industry in California.
The main challenge facing the Taiwan industry, in Li's view,
is the shortage of high-level senior engineering talent, especially
in areas such as photo-electronics and wireless communications.
Taiwan's key strengths lie in digital design; it lacks talent
with sufficient background in materials and analog technology.
While engineers could be attracted from China, the complications
of the cross-Strait relationship make it difficult to bring
them over to work in Taiwan. Although the government has talked
about liberalizing regulations in this regard, progress has
been slow. As a result, many Taiwanese companies have been relying
heavily on Indian and Russian engineers.
The lack of direct transport links with China adds another
element of inconvenience to the industry's operations. With
Taiwan now serving chiefly as the base for product development,
marketing, and financial support, while China handles manufacture
and assembly, travel between the two sides is excessively time-consuming.
Executives of multinational companies "don't want to waste
their time sitting around airports in transit," says Li.
"If the production is in China and the head office is in
Taiwan, many will simply request that all meetings take place
in, for example, Shanghai."
The China advantage
While transport ties may be troublesome, China does provide
the low-cost manufacturing environment that has enabled Taiwanese
companies to stay competitive. "There are very few negatives,"
says TAITRA vice president David Liu. "Although computer
production is moving to China, everything is being integrated
in Taiwan to better meet specific customer needs." Taiwan
remains the location of production for higher-end production
or customized products, and orders are still received through
head offices on the island.
Even large Chinese companies like Legend are sourcing through
Taiwan. In 2003, according to TAITRA, Legend's procurement from
Taiwan exceeded US$1 billion, covering a wide range of finished
products and components. Taiwanese companies are also continuing
to stay ahead of their Chinese counterparts in terms of productivity.
"No one can compete with a company like Foxconn in this
area," says Liu. And he points to the rapid growth being
registered by Quanta Computer, whose annual revenue last year
of US$8 billion was double that of two years before. "Can
you imagine that kind of growth anywhere else?" asks Liu.
Taiwan now boasts a number of billion-dollar companies, whose
"size gives them a formidable advantage and discourages
new entrants," he adds.
To keep those orders flooding into Taiwan, TAITRA has developed
an "ABC" system, which is essentially a platform to
handle orders from three top IT players (A): IBM, HP, and Compaq.
These orders are then parceled out to 31 top Taiwanese IT suppliers
(B), while involving financial management and cash flow (C),
delivery (D), and e-commerce and logistics (E). The convenience
of the system is encouraging even more outsourcing to Taiwan,
directly benefiting Taiwanese companies.
To this alphabetical mix, HP's Ho adds an R for radio-frequency
identification -- another element growing rapidly in importance.
"HP has started shipping to Walmart using RFID on our pallets
and boxes," she says. "Logistically, RFID is not just
an ID but also tells you what kind of product it is and its
global location as well as providing global tracking, inventory
control, and fraud management."
The change in focus from Taiwan as a production center to treating
the island as a sourcing base is apparent at TAITRA. In 1992,
the organization launched the "It's Very Well Made in Taiwan"
campaign. Then, as production migrated to China, the slogan
shifted in the late 1990s to "It's Very Well Made by Taiwanese."
Now TAITRA is touting "Sourcing through Taiwan," and
already has some impressive accomplishments under its belt.
In 1997, it initiated an international sourcing project, helping
to put multinational companies in touch with local suppliers.
To date, it has completed more than 2,500 cases that have generated
billions of dollars in new and recurring business. In May 2002,
for example, Japan's NEC assigned TAITRA to help supply 650
IT items, sending 7,500 blueprints for different products and
designs. TAITRA set up a dedicated web site and contacted 700
local companies, screening these down to 277 finalists. It successfully
filled all 650 product requirements within a month, generating
US$500 million in new orders and reducing procurement costs
for NEC by 30%.
Moving on to branding?
Most IT manufacturers in Taiwan are contract manufacturers
that feel the pain of global pricing strategies. They face a
difficult choice. Continuing with the OEM/ODM model can still
be highly profitable if companies succeed in both holding down
costs and amassing enough volume to make up for the low margins.
Building close customer relations provides some assurance of
a long-term relationship, but ultimately there is always the
risk that one day the buyer will shift to a different source
of supply. The other route, to develop brands as a means of
protection against this threat, is also far from easy to achieve.
In terms of global branding capability, Taiwanese companies
still have a long way to go.
Business Week annually publishes a Global 500 brands list,
on which HP currently ranks as No. 12. In 2002, the only Taiwanese
company to make the list was Acer, and it was well down toward
the bottom. When Acer reorganized, spinning off BenQ and Wistron,
it dropped off the list entirely. Now, BenQ is trying to develop
its brand, but HP's Ho notes the challenge that entails. BenQ
markets in 19 countries, while HP is active in 160. HP spends
US$8 billion a year on marketing and branding, which "tells
you how much you have to pay," says Ho.
Among the criteria to make the Business Week list is that the
brand has to sell the product, not the other way around. Acer,
says Ho, found that its product was "selling" the
brand.
John Collins, public relations manager at Wistron, agrees about
the difficulty of making the leap to branding. "Currently,
major Taiwanese OEM companies are sticking with OEM," he
says. "Branding is wonderful, but so far we have yet to
see companies do both manufacturing and branding well. It's
a difficult migration."
Collins finds that Wistron's customers like knowing that the
company is truly focused on ODM. "Previously, under Acer,
our customers would perceive that when it came to crunch time,
we would give Acer priority as to who got components. Companies
assume that you'll worry more about your own groups' brands
rather than theirs. So we are very clear with our customers
that we strictly focus on OEM, with no brand of our own. They
get automatic priority."
Big brands, says Collins, are looking for long-term partners.
They do not want to spend a lot of time developing the relationship,
only to find out that their partner companies suddenly want
to develop their own brands.
The computer association's Li notes that the problem with establishing
a brand is that you wind up competing with your own customers.
For that reason, most companies in Taiwan are remaining OEM
and ODM players; Taiwanese manufacturers may hold a 70% share
of the PC market, but the consuming public has no idea who they
are.
Henry Wang, Acer Inc.'s senior director of public relations,
has a different take on the question of branding, based on the
Acer Group's experience. Acer Inc. (the parent company of the
Acer Group) several years ago switched from a manufacturing
business model to one based on the global marketing of brand-name
PC-related products and services. As part of that shift, Acer's
PC manufacturing unit split off to become Wistron Corp. And
BenQ, which was formerly known as Acer Communications and Multimedia,
launched its branding program.
Acer is now enjoying good profitability by outsourcing to top-tier
vendors and channel partners to build an efficient supply chain,
providing customers with competitively priced, value-added products.
By reducing overhead, raising operational efficiency, and increasing
economies of scale, says Wang, this business model has enhanced
Acer's brand position to support company growth. The company
now has more flexibility to respond quickly to market requirements
and keep partners content.
Wang points to successes in 2003, when Acer became the world's
No. 6 brand for PCs and notebooks, No. 4 for PCs in Western
Europe, and No. 2 for notebooks in Western Europe, while registering
the highest growth among the top 10 vendors worldwide. By the
fourth quarter of 2003, Acer was the No. 1 notebook brand in
eight countries in Western Europe: Germany, Italy, the Netherlands,
Switzerland, Spain, the Czech Republic, Austria, and Belgium.
It was also the No. 1 LCD brand in Western Europe.
What has worked for Acer, however, may not be the solution for
everyone. In the end, companies will have the find their own
answer depending on their market, their customer relationships,
and their core competencies. "To brand or not to brand"
is likely to remain a key question for Taiwan industry for some
time.
Converging at Computex
Computex Taipei, the world's second largest computer exhibition,
showcased the increasing importance of convergent technologies
as it set new records this year.
The 2004 show, held during the first week of June, attracted
26,222 professional international visitors, up 17.85% from last
year and bettering the previous record registered in 2002. The
number of domestic visitors was also up sharply at 82,602, as
was the number of international journalists (531). Last year
the outbreak of SARS caused the show to be postponed to the
fall, resulting in lower than normal attendance.
This year, the leading Taiwanese companies were in full attendance,
including Acer, BenQ, Foxconn, Mitac, Sampo, Tatung, and Via.
The show also attracted international luminaries such as Intel,
Microsoft, and Texas Instruments. In addition, several local
companies, such as Foxconn and Asus, that formerly specialized
in OEM and ODM work, introduced new branded products.
The top country in terms of visitor origin was the United States,
followed by Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Singapore. Strong
attendance from Germany, China, Malaysia, Austria, India, Thailand,
Indonesia, and Canada further ensured that the event was truly
international.
Exhibitor numbers also saw strong growth. This year, 1,347
exhibitors occupied 2,828 booths, and net exhibition space grew
by 16.9% from last year, making Computex Taipei the second largest
professional information-technology show in the world. It now
trails only CeBIT in Hanover, Germany.
Computex Taipei is organized jointly by the Taiwan External
Trade Development Council (TAITRA) -- formerly CETRA -- and
the Taipei Computer Association. This year marked the 24th consecutive
show. Over the years, the show has grown to the extent that
demand for space now far exceeds what is available at the Taipei
World Trade Center. Construction has now started at a second
exhibition center in Nangang; completion of that facility in
August 2006 is expected to solve the space shortages.
Integration was a major theme at the show, and new products
were primarily targeted at concepts such as digital home, wireless
environment, Internet applications, and audio and visual quality.
More attention is being paid to design and to making products
more user-friendly to attract a broader range of consumers.
Major development trends in evidence at the show included all-in-one
multifunctionality, environmental consciousness, and human-machine
interface friendliness.
Stan Shih, chairman of the Acer Group, outlined the challenges
and opportunities facing personal computers in digital homes.
Referring to the debate as to whether such homes will revolve
around PCs or TVs, Shih said he was confident that with continued
improvements in technology and products, PC manufacturers would
find abundant opportunities to expand their businesses.
Since digital-home products mostly connect via wireless LAN,
Shih said they should be easy to use, reliable, and compatible.
After-sales service will also be crucial, he noted, as will
improvements in management efficiency at home-appliance makers.
As part of the move toward digital homes, flat-panel displays
took a prominent place at the show, including products that
combine monitors, TVs, and home-theater displays. Many leading-edge
technologies, such as wireless, flat-panel displays, IC design,
security, and high-speed connection, were gathered in specialty
pavilions.
Computex 2005 will be held May 31 to June 4 at the Taipei World
Trade Center.
BenQ: Branding as a Religion
BenQ, one of the Taiwan companies putting the greatest effort
into establishing its own brand, is staking its success on its
ability to forge an image for its products as central to a digital
consumer lifestyle. "We're the only ones doing this, to
my knowledge," the company's chief marketing officer, Jerry
Wang, told the Taipei Foreign Correspondents' Club in June,
noting the company's TV commercials featuring lifestyle rather
than product information. "We're in a unique position in
that we have a multi-technology platform, not just computers,"
he said, referring to the company's product mix of digital cameras,
MP3 players, and mobile phones, as well as computers, displays,
and peripherals.
BenQ's message appears to be getting through. The company's
LCD monitors are currently the second best-selling brand in
Australia and number three in Canada. Total company revenue
has grown from US$1 billion in 1995 to US$2.3 billion in 2003,
of which US$1 billion came from branded products. Wang said
he expects the branded business to grow to US$3 billion in 2005
and US$5 billion in 2007.
Wang predicts that 2008 will represent a major milestone --
the year that BenQ's sales of branded products exceed its revenue
from OEM and ODM business. In the first quarter of 2004, the
brand accounted for 31% of total revenue, up from 27% a year
earlier.
One of the reasons why BenQ has been able to grow so quickly,
observed Wang, is that it has continued to invest not only in
communications, but also in product development. In the year
and a half since BenQ set up a "Digital Lifestyle Design
Team," the unit has grown from six to more than 60 engineers
working on delivering better-quality designs.
BenQ's success can be seen in the number of prestigious awards
it has received. "In March, we received seven awards for
our designs, equivalent to Sony and Samsung," said Wang.
That kind of recognition provides vital reinforcement because
corporate commitment is important to successful branding. Many
people think that branding is all about money -- or "No
money, no talk," as Wang puts it -- but the marketing executive
says this is actually not the case. "You don't need huge
money like Samsung, which spends US$500 million per year to
build a brand." (Wang declined to give BenQ's own promotional
budget, which he said was confidential).
A good branding strategy, said Wang, encompasses more than
just communication. He considers three factors to be essential
to a successful global branding strategy. The first is strong
overseas management capabilities -- crucial for mastering the
vast cultural differences from country to country. For companies
that just want to do OEM and ODM, understanding global markets
is not a priority. The second factor is excellent technological
and product-development capabilities, and the third is solid
marketing and distribution.
According to Wang, who has 20 years in the industry at Acer
and then its BenQ spinoff, the reason most attempts by Taiwanese
companies to build brands over the past two decades ago ended
in failure is poor overseas management. But in contrast to the
previous generation of decision-makers, Wang and his fellow
executives at BenQ have considerable international experience
under their belts. Wang, for example, worked in Europe from
1991 to 1997 before returning to Taipei at the behest of Acer
Chairman Stan Shih to take over brand management.
"You cannot just graduate from management school and expect
to be a good leader," he maintained. Good managers need
a lot of on-hands experience and must live in a country before
understanding it well enough to be able to handle brand marketing
there. "The way you talk to Germans and Dutch is totally
different. They way to conduct a meeting in Britain and France
is totally different. If I hadn't been there, I wouldn't know
this. That's the difference."
BenQ believes in developing local managerial talent in foreign
countries, and has been particularly successful in attracting
managers away from Japanese and Korean plants. But when it first
sets up shop in a new market, it dispatches a team of Taiwanese
expatriates to gradually bring the local personnel up to speed.
Later, when these Taiwanese managers return, they bring back
overseas experience and expertise that can be used to further
train staff in Taiwan.
In highly mature industries such as PCs, once companies reach
a certain scale, differentiation becomes very difficult. BenQ
devotes a lot of research effort to find the right way to differentiate
its products. Most of the products are designed inhouse, where
the company employs more than 2,000 engineers, though some design
work -- such as for notebook computers -- is outsourced.
"A lot of people are concerned about the conflict between
OEM/ODM and the branded business," said Wang, but "BenQ
had its own brand for a long time under Acer Inc. We coexisted
for a long time and didn't see the situation as a conflict."
Before launching its brand at the start of 2003, BenQ's management
talked to its OEM customers, informing them about the products
and markets where branding would begin. Wang regards it as important
to follow a two-pronged strategy -- both branding for long-term
profitability and OEM/ODM to provide economies of scale.
Volume provides advantages in the market. "You can take
advantage of OEM and ODM to leverage your brand," said
Wang. That said, every "BenQ"-brand product on the
shelves it totally different from what is supplied to its OEM
and ODM customers. The design teams doing branding and those
doing OEM and ODM work completely separately to put its customers
at ease.
At the same time, BenQ also makes its new technology and products
available to OEM and ODM customers. "If we develop good
products and technology, we can share that with our ODM and
OEM customers to create value," said Wang. But the OEM/ODM
mentality is different from branding. "With a brand, you
start from the consumer and give the same cost but try to increase
value," noted Wang." For OEM and ODM, you start with
technology and then try to reduce costs."
Branding has come a long way in Taiwan, he observed. When BenQ
first launched its brand, the well-known local bookstore, Eslite,
carried perhaps four or five books on branding, he said. Now
there are 30 to 40, and Wang gets frequent invitations from
the government, universities, and other institutions to speak
on branding.
Yet most Taiwanese companies still face an uphill struggle
in building brands. Many simply do not have the scale that BenQ
enjoys, and are too technology-driven and find it hard to make
the shift to being what Wang calls "market- or consumer-centric."
They also have difficulty shedding the OEM/ODM fixation on cost.
In addition, many Taiwanese companies -- instead of sticking
it out for the long-term -- tend to jump in and out of the market
in various countries. Wang sees that as a mistake, since "Brands
have to be like a religion -- you have to believe in your brand."
|
|
More
Headlines... |
|

|